Google Plus: Why Facebook and Quora Should Worry

Google launched Google+ this week, and there have been many excellent posts highlighting its potential as well as its challenges. My first impressions are very positive. I will not regurgitate any of the points already made by others, and will limit this post to what I think has been missed.

Relevance: “The Mother Of All Streams”

Most of the commentary about Google Plus so far has focused on its social feature – “Circles”, a new way of grouping contacts for targeted sharing. But as I’ve said before, the future belongs to the Interest Graph complementing the Social Graph.Google-plus-logo-640

Facebook has done a not-so-great job capturing users’ interests. Many people have ‘Liked’ hundreds of pages just because they were asked to do so by their friends. Facebook’s obsession with and overreliance on the social graph has corrupted their interest graph, and this might well be Facebook’s Achilles Heel in the long term.

Google Plus takes a different approach. The goal of Sparks is to capture your true interests. It is in a primitive state at present, but I’m talking about the Big Picture here! As Andrew Tomkins explains:

“Sparks is essentially the stuff that flows to you through the interest graph and the stream is the stuff that flows to you through the social graph”

This is precisely what I described was the secret sauce behind Quora:

Quora’s newsfeed is an interesting showcase of what happens when you mix an Interest Graph with a Social Graph – and the result is the mysterious addictiveness so many have experienced, but found difficult to explain.

Steven Levy goes on to explain how the Google Plus team plans to mix these two to create the “mother of all streams”.

Also: Once Google gets to know you better, it can help provide more relevant search results. Classic search disambiguation problem – when user searches for ‘apple’ is it for the fruit or the company? Your interests from Sparks can help Google learn what you’re looking for.

Why Quora Should Be Worried

It was reported earlier today that code for Questions has been found in Google Plus. If this comes as a surprise, you haven’t understood Google’s ambitions with Emerald Sea.

Unlike Quora, where users/moderators need to manually tag Questions to fit their taxonomy, Google could easily auto-tag questions. Further, it could easily AutoComplete your Question in a way Quora could only hope. And even further, in many situations, Google could answer your question without waiting for a human being to respond.

Imagine such a Q&A service working across mobile devices, where Google knows your location and much more about your interests and friends.

Why Facebook Should Be Worried

AllFacebook has a great post on how Google Plus is a challenge for Facebook. Some folks have already opined that Facebook has nothing to fear, that the mainstream users are not going to join Google Plus and quit Facebook in droves. But pundits have been wrong before.

I wouldn’t dismiss Google Plus so quickly if I were Facebook. Challenges for Google Plus:

  • Critical Mass: Google Plus needs a critical mass of users if its ever to gain mainstream acceptance. However, these are very early days, and early adopter response has been largely positive.
  • Games: Mainstream users love games. Google is reported to have invested in Zynga, while Facebook has had a rocky relationship with them. What if the next Farmville were to launch exclusively on Google Plus and not on Facebook?
  • Simplicity: As it stands today, Google Plus is not actually more complicated than Facebook, it just feels like it because it is new. Try introducing Facebook to a first time user and walk through the different features, and you’ll agree that Facebook has slowly evolved to a much more complex service with a plethora of components. Google Plus will need to become simple and intuitive to attract a sizeable mass of followers before adding new features.

There are a lot of unknowns, and my take is that it’s too early to make predictions. In any case, the stickiness factor of Google Plus is a big challenge for Facebook.

I am very impressed with what I’ve seen so far. There are challenges, but for once, I think the Emerald Sea team is seeing things in the right perspective and making all the right moves. In Feb 2010, I explained Why Google Buzz Doesn’t KISS. So far, Google Plus does.

Tagged with:
 

Speaking at the ad:tech conference, Foursquare CEO Dennis Crowley offered a glimpse into the future of the service.

Customized Recommendations: Crowley discussed the possibility of a smarter algorithm that would make customized recommendations based on a user’s checkin history.

Brand Discovery: Building upon the idea of a smarter algorithm that would make recommendations based on where you’ve been, Crowley illustrated a future where brands would also be fused into that experience.

Compare this with Facebook’s announcement of Deals yesterday: Recommendations and Deal discovery will be based on Location Proximity and your Friends’ who enjoy deals.

Where have we seen this algorithmic vs. social approach before? :)

Also compare these quotes:

Dennis:

“We should be able to offer special deals that you may be interested in and we should be able to offer recommendations for the type of things you should do next.”

Schmidt:

“I actually think most people don’t want Google to answer their questions,” he elaborates. “They want Google to tell them what they should be doing next.”

Sound similar?

What does this mean?

Foursquare is taking a Googlesque algorithmic approach to location serendipity, while Facebook is focusing on its social aspect.

I think Foursquare is being cornered against a wall. Foursquare’s social graph is a hybrid one, incorporating friends from Facebook, Twitter, and other sources. With Facebook’s ubiquitous mobile platform unveiled yesterday, it has to one-up Facebook. Hence, it is turning to smarter algorithms, in typical Google fashion.

Will Foursquare face the same fate as other social startups thanks to Facebook? Time will tell.

Tagged with:
 

Is Facebook a Black Hole Sending Social Startups to Oblivion?

Facebook is reportedly testing a new feature to auto-tweet a link to Twitter when you post pictures on Facebook. All Facebook sees this as a danger sign for TwitPic, while TheNextWeb hints that Facebook is aiming for Ping.fm.

This is already becoming a trend. When giant Facebook introduces a new feature, some startups are going to feel the heat. Let’s look at the ground we have covered so far and what may lie in the future.

Startups For Conversation

In Aug 2009, Facebook acquired FriendFeed. We all know what happened since. When Facebook wants to be the place where you go for having conversations, what is the fate of startups focusing on FriendFeed-style conversations? Simler was hyped to some extent last year, and has shut down already. Two hold-outs in the conversation space are Cliqset and Amplify. Here are traffic stats for Cliqset, FriendFeed, and Amplify over the last year:

The graph doesn’t make sense if you include Facebook in it, as both Cliqset and Amplify are indistinguishable from the X-Axis. Both of them have had rave reviews from early-adopters and tech bloggers.

Facebook Groups may well be the nail in the coffin for startups aiming to be the place where you have conversations. Even the giant Google is still struggling with Google Buzz to establish it’s own conversation space independent of Facebook. I don’t see much conversation happening on Windows Live, except as a shell to Facebook.

Startups for Lifestreaming

In my view, the Facebook Newsfeed has effectively demolished the hype surrounding Lifestreaming. StoryTlr shut down in Oct 2009. Chi.mp continues to exist, providing a free way to own your own domain, content, and identity. Have you heard anything about it in the last six months?

The concept of having your own content on your own domain with your own identity appears to have died in the age of the social web, except in the hearts of a few digerati.

Social Commenting

Facebook has now introduced voting in its comments plugin. Once it becomes adequately feature-rich, it will be an attractive option for publishers wanting to capitalize on traffic from Facebook. This can be a direct threat to Disqus, Intense Debate, and Echo, as noted by RWW last month.

Why would Facebook be interested in comments? A comment is a stronger signal than “Like”. Users may “Like” content casually, but when they comment, it indicates true engagement.

None of these commenting startups have been able to capitalize on the social aspect of commenting, where you can follow where your friends have commented. Facebook has the wherewithal to do this and I would expect this to be a focus area for Facebook in the future.

Social Startup Funding

Last month, Kleiner Perkins announced the launch of the $250 million sFund, in partnership with Facebook, Amazon, and Zynga to encourage innovation in social. From the release:

Facebook will contribute access to its platform teams, beta APIs, and new programs, like Facebook Credits.

In other words, integrate and play nice with Facebook if you’re a social startup eyeing any of that money.

Is there room for startups in the social space independent of Facebook? Twitter has not exactly been kind to developers in its ecosystem, while the waiting game with Google continues. The Age of Facebook seems to have begun.

Tagged with:
 

Visit to Facebook India Hyderabad Office (Pics)

I just returned from a visit to Facebook’s India office at Hyderabad for a special event organized by Facebook for its strategic partners in India. I had a great time learning more about their Indian operations and about Facebook culture in general.

The office is beautifully designed and decorated with paintings made by the employees themselves. I have received many requests to get pictures of the office, so here they are!

The Charminar

A recreation of Hyderabad’s most famous monument, the Charminar (click to view in full resolution):

Charminar

Facebook Mottos

Mottos are painted on columns in great style:

Where The $$$ Comes From

It’s Not Only About India

Refreshments

It was especially great to meet and interact with Kirthiga Reddy, Director of Online Operations and Head of Office India, and Grady Burnett, Director Global Online and Inside Sales, who was visiting at the time.

The team is inspired, motivated, and ambitious. Here’s wishing them good luck!

Tagged with:
 

Facebook’s Main Enemy Is Not Google; It Is Email

A recent research survey revealed that:

  • Over 66% of web users share content with friends and family, with 50% doing it at least once a week.
  • 86% of respondents still used email to share content, while only 49% said they used Facebook.
  • For ages 18-24, 76% said they used Facebook to share content, compared with 70% via email

For all the tech press that the Facebook vs. Google battle receives, I think this is a more fundamental battle that is key to Facebook in the long term.

Why?

Email Is Private

Gmail’s famed creator Paul Buchheit has been with Facebook for over a year. We have not seen any noteworthy feature enhancement to Facebook’s internal messaging system for a long time. They have introduced Places, Groups, high-res Photos, and a host of other enhancements, but nothing for messaging.

This is because private messages between people are explicitly private. There is no social element involved that can be legitimately captured. Remember the Gmail targeted ad controversy? Facebook has already learnt that lesson, thanks to Google.

Email Bypasses Facebook

Email works with standard POP3/IMAP protocols and is interoperable between platforms, services, and devices from various vendors. Emails sent between web users of these different services offer no value for Facebook. In fact, Email bypasses Facebook altogether and therein lies the battle.

Facebook wants to know when you Like any content on the web. Facebook wants to be the place where you go to share content you Like. The Facebook Like button is intended to replace the Email Send button.

The Future Is Public Social Sharing

Who will win this battle? Web user behavior is largely turning to public social sharing. Emails are being reduced largely to notifications and quick messages, rather than any real content sharing. It isn’t so difficult to see where we’re headed. Just ask the 18-24 year olds.

Tagged with:
 

From the Google Zeitgeist conference Tuesday, the WSJ reports:

Mr. Schmidt said Google hoped to at least get access to Facebook users’ contact lists so that people can grow their social network on Google. He said, without elaborating, that Google’s products would incorporate more social-networking elements later this year.

"The best thing that would happen is for Facebook to open up its data," Mr. Schmidt said. "Failing that, there are other ways to get that information." He declined to be specific.

In other words, Google is now admitting that it wants access to Facebook’s social graph.

A Mess Of Multiple Social Graphs

Consider the implications of this admission. At present, Google has built multiple social graphs:

Now, despite having built all these social graphs over the years, Google wants access to your Facebook Friends, which is an implicit admission of its past social failures.

Microsoft’s Approach To Social: “The Glue”

In a recent blog post, Microsoft described their approach of partnering for social:

Facebook, MySpace, Orkut and QQ have become more general-purpose social networks for all of your acquaintances. LinkedIn, Xing, and Viadeo are great places for professional interactions, …there are great photo and video sharing sites like Flickr and YouTube, and hundreds of others that provide content and let customers post, comment, rate and re-share.

In light of this, we’re not trying to be yet another general-purpose social network, real-time public broadcast channel, or video sharing site. There are great services out there for these things already.

Microsoft’s approach seems to be working. With 330 million active users, Windows Live Messenger is the #4 worldwide app used by active Facebook users, just behind the most popular games like Farmville.

Windows Live is thus connected to 40+ different services, including virtually all of the popular social networks, audio/video/photo/music networks, and anything else you can imagine. They are also partnering with anyone using open standards like OAuth, Portable Contacts, Activity Streams, etc. – no longer a Google USP.

This stealth approach by Microsoft was also identified as Google’s approach by the Altimeter Group last year, but Google has not made much progress since then.

Where Does Google Me Go From Here?

From the latest reports, Google Me is about an additional “social layer” on top of:

  • YouTube – I see this as a primary thrust area for Google (social recommendations)
  • Search – possible enhancements to Social Search
  • Google Maps – greater integration with Latitude, possibly FourSquare?
  • Picasa /Flickr – social sharing enhancements
  • A social gaming platform – from Zynga

The key question is, which social graph will Google use to add this “social layer”? With rivals Facebook and Microsoft partnering closely, Google has one ally left: Twitter. An integration of Google Profiles with Twitter can yield exciting possibilities.

Twitter’s relationship with Windows Live isn’t going too good. This might be Google’s opportunity in disguise. However, it’s going to be an uphill battle.

Update: After writing this post, All Things D reports a deepening of ties between Facebook and Microsoft Bing. This is a direct assault on Google’s bread-n-butter search business. All the more reason why Google needs to reciprocate by deepening its ties with Twitter.

Twitter is increasingly becoming a media company and a pervasive news platform, as Mathew Ingram writes at GigaOm. Why not a Twitter-integrated Google News? A personalized Google News based on users’ social graph on Twitter would be a great start.

Tagged with:
 

Another day and I read another post on how Facebook’s Like button is slowly obliterating Google’s Link as the next currency of the web. The pondered question in this case is what is going to be Google’s counter-offensive against the Like.

The assumption is that Google as a search engine has worked on the principle of ranking web pages according to the number of other pages linking to it. Well, here’s the deal: when a person likes something on the web, in most cases, a link is created. Google can see this Link, and hence can understand and incorporate the Like, in its scheme of things.

This mechanism has already been publicized by Google, but I’m surprised how many folks still keep discovering it as if it were something new. For example, see this from yesterday.

Google’s Invisible Like Mechanism

Google’s Like mechanism was announced by Google in Oct 2009 in a blog post announcing Social Search, which linked to this help article that explains how it works in the background.

Google Socal Search Like Button

The battle is between Facebook’s Like and Google’s Profiles. For Facebook to capture your Like, it requires you to have an account on Facebook. For Google to capture your Likes, you need to have a Google Profile. Now, let’s compare what Facebook and Google can capture:

Facebook can capture only your Facebook Likes.

Google Profiles can capture:

  • Public content you share on Facebook
  • All tweets on Twitter
  • All shares on Google Reader
  • All shares on FriendFeed
  • All status updates on LinkedIn
  • All favorites from YouTube
  • All likes, faves, photos from Flickr and Picasa
  • All bookmarks from Delicious
  • All stories you have Digged
  • Everything you have Stumbled Upon
  • Everything you have Disqused
  • All your Blogger and WordPress blog posts
  • And dozens of existing and future sites using the XFN or FOAF standards (see FAQ)

Get the picture? From a technical standpoint, Google has all the arms and ammunition to capture Likes across a plethora of social websites. If you have a Google Profile, every action on any of your connected social websites (sort of) results in a Like being submitted to Google.

Google’s Challenge

Presentation: Currently, Google is surfacing all this behind-the-scenes information only through Social Search results. Google doesn’t have a social web site where you can see your friends’ Likes and interact with them. This is potentially the core of what Google Me is all about.

Numbers: Facebook has 500 million, very few have Google Profiles. We have been waiting for that big push for Google Profiles. It is imminent, and apparently, very close.

Tagged with:
 

Skeptic Geek: Now on Facebook!

Though I prefer Google Reader and Twitter as my news sources of choice, many others use Facebook. Skeptic Geek Logo 75x75

A few weeks back, I decided to experiment with Facebook Like buttons on all my blog posts. The results were very surprising. Earlier, many of my posts became popular because they were shared by some influencers on Google Reader and Twitter. However, Facebook has surprisingly remained a significant source of readers.

More importantly, since Skeptic Geek is platform and company agnostic, posts become popular on different networks depending on the content. For example, my post on Is Windows Live Delivering What Google Buzz Promised? took a critical stance on Google, was not shared by any influencers I know, but has almost 950 shares on Facebook (at the time of this writing).

This is why I decided to put an end to my neglect of the Facebook Platform, and have chosen to leverage it. I remain platform agnostic, and will continue to be impartial in my critique of the social web. This is just another way of letting my readers have more choice in their preferred way of reading Skeptic Geek.

If you wish, you can become a fan on Facebook here.

Tagged with:
 

Matrix: Google Buzz, Twitter Chirp, Facebook F8

This is how the events launching new social network features compared:

Buzz-Chrip-F8

Pretty self-explanatory.

Tagged with:
 

Predicting Tech News in 2015

Last month, Stuart Miles, founder of the gadget and tech blog Pocket-Lint, asked me to contribute to its feature on “FutureWeek”:

What gadgets will we be using in 2015, where will Augmented Reality take us? What about robots, gadgets of the future, super-fast internet speeds, cars, materials of 2015 and much, much more.

The entire set of stories make excellent reading with insights from thought-leaders around the web. Apart from gadgets, there are other posts on what to expect from the semantic web and how we will consume content in 2015. Being in the technology news business, my thoughts were included in What will be the big tech stories in 2015.

I would like to elaborate on my thoughts here. I must say that these ‘predictions’ are nothing but a reflection of my hopes as well as fears. Further, I sent these on 21st March, after which there have been some interesting developments.

Facebook will not become AOL 2.0. To remain competitive, it will be forced to interoperate with other networks.

There has been discussion on this issue time and again on the web. I personally think the web is resilient to any attempts to dominate it in the long term. I also think the team working at Facebook is wise to learn from the past.

Social Networks will no longer be "places" on the web. Instead, your "social graph" will follow you on the web.

  1. You will control your social graph – choose and add from among different networks – Facebook, Twitter, Google, Windows Live – which will all be interoperable using an open standard. This evolution of social networking will be similar to that of Instant Messaging, where the open XMPP standard became popular, achieving interoperability to an extent.
  2. Rather than social networks wanting you to visit and spend time on their site, they will compete to become an inseparable part of the time you spend online, whether mobile or desktop.
  3. The social graph that follows you will help personalize and customize your browsing experience for everything:
  • Primary Content on websites – for example, which headlines/articles you see
  • Ads – tailored to your social identity and graph
  • Search Results
  • Which friends of yours are online, shown within your browser
  • Reactions/comments from your friends optionally shown for the web page you’re visiting

All the above is pretty self-explanatory. We are already seeing glimpses of this in Facebook chat, Google Sidewiki, and so on. Interestingly, one week after I sent these, there were reports of Facebook planning a “Like” button for any content anywhere on the web, and launching a Meebo-style persistent toolbar. Imagine my reaction when I saw these developments! :)

Websites will personalize according to your social graph using mechanisms like Facebook Connect, Google Friend Connect, Twitter Following/Followers graph, etc.

This is an ongoing trend I see towards a personalized relevant web. Again, a week afterwards, there were reports of Facebook sharing your profile data with external sites, so that these sites will tailor content for you.

I had also pointed out Facebook Connect being a mechanism for precisely this goal, when I wrote in January about Facebook’s non-portable data-portability. Marshall Kirkpatrick now points it out as well: there’s a big difference between opt-in and opt-out “data portability”.

Anti-trust legislation will be a major threat to Google’s dominance both in US and EU. "Will Google split up?" will be a question discussed in the media.

This is speculation. Google’s expansion into virtually every aspect of technology have already brought it under the scrutiny of anti-trust authorities.

Apple’s mindshare will start to decline. As Steve Jobs approaches retirement, questions will be asked of Apple’s survival.

Two weeks after I sent this, the question of what happens after the iPad and after Steve Jobs has been asked. I have my doubts about Apple’s innovation and competitive capabilities in a post-Jobs era, but would be happy if they’re proved wrong.

Privacy and Anti-Piracy will continue to make headlines.

  1. On Privacy: We would move to a public-by-default, private by opt-in model.
  2. On Anti-Piracy: Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) will be in place, along with a global version of the DMCA.

These are my fears and they are very real. ACTA negotiations are making progress, and includes a global version of the DMCA. The politicians behind these negotiations may not understand technology and the people who understand the technology are busy writing about other topics that get their blogs more traffic. It’s also a case of those who matter, don’t understand; those who understand, don’t matter.

Do read the other pieces in FutureWeek. And thanks to Stuart for the opportunity to share my thoughts!

Tagged with:
 

Switch to our mobile site