<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Googler&#8217;s Take on Social Networking Reveals Chinks in Facebook&#8217;s Armor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor</link>
	<description>Impartial Observations on Technology and the Social Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unfriendly: Google Blocking Ex-Employee&#8217;s &#34;Social Circles&#34; Book (Oh Yeah, He Now Works At Facebook) &#124; Tech 2 Up</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-2091</link>
		<dc:creator>Unfriendly: Google Blocking Ex-Employee&#8217;s &#34;Social Circles&#34; Book (Oh Yeah, He Now Works At Facebook) &#124; Tech 2 Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 05:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/#comment-2091</guid>
		<description>[...] work at Google on user experience and made a popular presentation that suggested how Google could go after Facebook in the social space — namely, friend groups. That, of course, ended up happening with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] work at Google on user experience and made a popular presentation that suggested how Google could go after Facebook in the social space — namely, friend groups. That, of course, ended up happening with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unfriendly: Google Blocking Ex-Employee&#8217;s &#34;Social Circles&#34; Book (Oh Yeah, He Now Works At Facebook) &#124; TechCrunch</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-2085</link>
		<dc:creator>Unfriendly: Google Blocking Ex-Employee&#8217;s &#34;Social Circles&#34; Book (Oh Yeah, He Now Works At Facebook) &#124; TechCrunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 00:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/#comment-2085</guid>
		<description>[...] work at Google on user experience and made a popular presentation that suggested how Google could go after Facebook in the social space — namely, friend groups. That, of course, ended up happening with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] work at Google on user experience and made a popular presentation that suggested how Google could go after Facebook in the social space — namely, friend groups. That, of course, ended up happening with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2010: A Year of Blogging, Curating, and Sharing Tech News by @ScepticGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-1892</link>
		<dc:creator>2010: A Year of Blogging, Curating, and Sharing Tech News by @ScepticGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/#comment-1892</guid>
		<description>[...] Googler’s Take on Social Networking Reveals Chinks in Facebook’s Armor (15,657) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Googler’s Take on Social Networking Reveals Chinks in Facebook’s Armor (15,657) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebookの&#8217;フレンド&#8217;の非現実性を指摘したPaul AdamsがFacebookに移籍&#8211;Googleからの異様な頭脳流出</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-1882</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebookの&#8217;フレンド&#8217;の非現実性を指摘したPaul AdamsがFacebookに移籍&#8211;Googleからの異様な頭脳流出</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/#comment-1882</guid>
		<description>[...] 今朝（米国時間12/20）、Googleのユーザ体験部門(User Experience, UX)を指揮していたPaul Adamsが、1月からFacebookの社員になると発表した。彼はあの有名なスライドで、Facebookのソーシャルグラフには重大な欠点があり、人間の本当の人間関係を表せない、と指摘した。Adamsはこれまで4年あまり、GoogleのUXチームで仕事をしていた。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 今朝（米国時間12/20）、Googleのユーザ体験部門(User Experience, UX)を指揮していたPaul Adamsが、1月からFacebookの社員になると発表した。彼はあの有名なスライドで、Facebookのソーシャルグラフには重大な欠点があり、人間の本当の人間関係を表せない、と指摘した。Adamsはこれまで4年あまり、GoogleのUXチームで仕事をしていた。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One social network to rule them all? A modest proposal &#171; here&#39;s the thing:</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-1591</link>
		<dc:creator>One social network to rule them all? A modest proposal &#171; here&#39;s the thing:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 18:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/#comment-1591</guid>
		<description>[...] Facebook’s focus on real-life relationships, Google will seek to beat them at their own game. A recent presentation by Google employee Paul Adams, who’s believed to be working on Google’s putative social [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Facebook’s focus on real-life relationships, Google will seek to beat them at their own game. A recent presentation by Google employee Paul Adams, who’s believed to be working on Google’s putative social [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RealID is still lousy. &#124; Azeroth. Me.</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-955</link>
		<dc:creator>RealID is still lousy. &#124; Azeroth. Me.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 04:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/#comment-955</guid>
		<description>[...] find it most useful. If you&#8217;ve got a moment or five, it&#8217;s worth looking through this presentation on social networking, which goes into a lot of the problems with the current (Facebook-driven, RealID-adopted) model of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] find it most useful. If you&#8217;ve got a moment or five, it&#8217;s worth looking through this presentation on social networking, which goes into a lot of the problems with the current (Facebook-driven, RealID-adopted) model of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jannik Lindquist</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-941</link>
		<dc:creator>Jannik Lindquist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 04:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/#comment-941</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, Paul Adam is wrong in just about everything he says about Facebook. Yes, all your contacs are called &quot;Friends&quot; on Facebook - but that doesn&#039;t mean, that you can&#039;t group them. In fact, Facebook offers great options for keeping your groups separate. You can post a status, an image or an album to any given group (or groups) - or you can block any given group (or groups) from seeing a status, an image or an album. Whether you think Facebook&#039;s options are complicated is a matter of taste - but it is pretty absurd to deny their existence</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, Paul Adam is wrong in just about everything he says about Facebook. Yes, all your contacs are called &#8220;Friends&#8221; on Facebook &#8211; but that doesn&#39;t mean, that you can&#39;t group them. In fact, Facebook offers great options for keeping your groups separate. You can post a status, an image or an album to any given group (or groups) &#8211; or you can block any given group (or groups) from seeing a status, an image or an album. Whether you think Facebook&#39;s options are complicated is a matter of taste &#8211; but it is pretty absurd to deny their existence</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A different kind of social &#124; b r a n t s</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator>A different kind of social &#124; b r a n t s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 04:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/#comment-932</guid>
		<description>[...] Mahendra&#039;s excellent key takeaways+thoughts post if you need a quick snapshot without having to read 216 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mahendra&#39;s excellent key takeaways+thoughts post if you need a quick snapshot without having to read 216 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can Google Figure Out How to Appeal to Lobsters As Well As Pandas?</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>Can Google Figure Out How to Appeal to Lobsters As Well As Pandas?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/#comment-930</guid>
		<description>[...] to attack this defect in its makeup: it is thinking hard about how social networks function, if a recent presentation by a Google staffer is anything to go by, and it is attempting to hire a &#8220;head of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to attack this defect in its makeup: it is thinking hard about how social networks function, if a recent presentation by a Google staffer is anything to go by, and it is attempting to hire a &#8220;head of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Endy</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/comment-page-1/#comment-923</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Endy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 11:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/googlers-take-on-social-networking-reveals-chinks-in-facebooks-armor/#comment-923</guid>
		<description>Great points. I saw these issues clearly years ago. I disagree that one social network platform can&#039;t handle it all. It&#039;s just a matter of allowing users to categorize connections as close, moderate, or moderate, and being able to group users and address posts to certain groups. FB already allows groups. It would be fairly easy to make these changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points. I saw these issues clearly years ago. I disagree that one social network platform can&#39;t handle it all. It&#39;s just a matter of allowing users to categorize connections as close, moderate, or moderate, and being able to group users and address posts to certain groups. FB already allows groups. It would be fairly easy to make these changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

