<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Buzz doesn&#8217;t KISS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-buzz-doesnt-kiss</link>
	<description>Impartial Observations on Technology and the Social Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Quora Becoming What Google Buzz Should Have Been? by @ScepticGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/comment-page-1/#comment-1912</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Quora Becoming What Google Buzz Should Have Been? by @ScepticGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 06:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/#comment-1912</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Buzz adopted the FriendFeed aggregation model, and failed to KISS. Quora avoided aggregation altogether. It has kept it simple, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Buzz adopted the FriendFeed aggregation model, and failed to KISS. Quora avoided aggregation altogether. It has kept it simple, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Evolution from Numbers to Relevance &#8211; Mahendra Palsule - MediaNama</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/comment-page-1/#comment-1868</link>
		<dc:creator>The Evolution from Numbers to Relevance &#8211; Mahendra Palsule - MediaNama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/#comment-1868</guid>
		<description>[...] I discussed extensively in my post on why Google Buzz should not simply be yet-another-aggregator, lifestreaming and aggregation have failed to take off and gain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I discussed extensively in my post on why Google Buzz should not simply be yet-another-aggregator, lifestreaming and aggregation have failed to take off and gain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Evolution from Numbers to Relevance by @ScepticGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/comment-page-1/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>The Evolution from Numbers to Relevance by @ScepticGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/#comment-547</guid>
		<description>[...] I discussed extensively in my post on why Google Buzz should not simply be yet-another-aggregator, lifestreaming and aggregation have failed to take off and gain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I discussed extensively in my post on why Google Buzz should not simply be yet-another-aggregator, lifestreaming and aggregation have failed to take off and gain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahendra</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/comment-page-1/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahendra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/#comment-460</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Robert - I hope so too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Robert &#8211; I hope so too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertHiggins</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/comment-page-1/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertHiggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/#comment-458</guid>
		<description>This a good post. It combines alot of what i have been feeling. In it&#039;s infancy Buzz is interesting. I love Friendfeed, and I like how Freindfeed has mellowed out over time. It hs a subtle charming quality now that A-List early adopters have mostly moved on. I think over time Buzz will also provide a more charming appeal once the new car smell has left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This a good post. It combines alot of what i have been feeling. In it&#39;s infancy Buzz is interesting. I love Friendfeed, and I like how Freindfeed has mellowed out over time. It hs a subtle charming quality now that A-List early adopters have mostly moved on. I think over time Buzz will also provide a more charming appeal once the new car smell has left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahad Bokhari</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/comment-page-1/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahad Bokhari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/#comment-453</guid>
		<description>Google&#039;s privacy track record is pristine - that&#039;s why everyone is coming down hard on them.  If you look at FB&#039;s it&#039;s the total opposite, stolen ideas etc etc.  I think eventually $Goog will get the social thing right..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#39;s privacy track record is pristine &#8211; that&#39;s why everyone is coming down hard on them.  If you look at FB&#39;s it&#39;s the total opposite, stolen ideas etc etc.  I think eventually $Goog will get the social thing right..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DShan</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/comment-page-1/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>DShan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/#comment-452</guid>
		<description>Fair enough.  Unfortunately that the space I care the least about their&lt;br&gt;customer service, but you have a valid point; getting into the social space&lt;br&gt;means you have to be social.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough.  Unfortunately that the space I care the least about their<br />customer service, but you have a valid point; getting into the social space<br />means you have to be social.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahendra</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/comment-page-1/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahendra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/#comment-450</guid>
		<description>Buzz doesn&#039;t fit in Reader either - imagine once other services are integrated. I don&#039;t want people&#039;s last.fm picks in my Reader!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are not the only one who can&#039;t get clarity on Wave/Buzz, Khürt. :) I don&#039;t think even Google has clarity - they&#039;re testing the waters right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buzz doesn&#39;t fit in Reader either &#8211; imagine once other services are integrated. I don&#39;t want people&#39;s last.fm picks in my Reader!</p>
<p>You are not the only one who can&#39;t get clarity on Wave/Buzz, Khürt. <img src='http://www.skepticgeek.com/geek/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I don&#39;t think even Google has clarity &#8211; they&#39;re testing the waters right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khürt</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/comment-page-1/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>Khürt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/#comment-449</guid>
		<description>I think that Wave should be re-deployed as an opt-in feature within the existing G-mail.  I don&#039;t think the Gmail is the right place for Buzz.  I think it should be an opt-in feature of Google Reader.  I can&#039;t get clarity around this but it just feels like a better fit conceptually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Wave should be re-deployed as an opt-in feature within the existing G-mail.  I don&#39;t think the Gmail is the right place for Buzz.  I think it should be an opt-in feature of Google Reader.  I can&#39;t get clarity around this but it just feels like a better fit conceptually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahendra</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/comment-page-1/#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahendra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticgeek.com/socialweb/google-buzz-doesnt-kiss/#comment-447</guid>
		<description>DShan,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In case of Buzz, there are two reasons why Google has been very responsive to feedback: one is because of privacy, which has always been an important issue with Google; second is their poor track record in the social space, which puts them on the defensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DShan,</p>
<p>In case of Buzz, there are two reasons why Google has been very responsive to feedback: one is because of privacy, which has always been an important issue with Google; second is their poor track record in the social space, which puts them on the defensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

