You Can Now Follow Quora Topics on Twitter

In November, TechCrunch noticed that Quora was mass-creating Twitter accounts, and was told that it was for a feature to be launched in the future, for following individual Quora topics on Twitter.

The good news: the feature is now live! You can now follow topics of your choice on Twitter from your Quora settings.

Quora Settings

In the Why Is Quora mass-creating Twitter accounts on Mechanical Turk question, Quora engineer Belinda Gu responded:

There are now official Quora Twitter accounts for the majority of topics on Quora, e.g. q_startups, q_food, q_quora.  Each topic Twitter account tweets out a stream of the new questions being asked on Quora in the given topic.

If you are connected to Twitter on Quora, you can go to http://www.quora.com/settings/twitter_topics and select a subset of your Quora topics to follow on Twitter.

Quora Questions on Twitter

This is a great move to increase user engagement by Quora and I am sure the early-adopter community of passionate Quora users will be delighted with this feature. It also highlights the increase in the popularity of Twitter over both email and RSS as a way to follow news updates.

Tagged with:
 

Filtering for Relevance with my6sense

As a champion of Relevance over Numbers, I have been happy to see the increasing popularity of my6sense – a mobile app for iPhone and Android that uses Digital Intuition to filter your social streams and provide you with personalized, relevant content.

my6sense_Home my6sense_AddContent

my6sense is simply the best tool to catch up with updates from your social networks. It works with Twitter, Google Buzz, and Facebook to get content, and you can also import your Google Reader feeds and add any specific websites if you wish. The mobile app allows you to share the content easily on any of the networks you’ve connected. The latest version 1.4 lets you post status updates and features a smart widget.

my6sense_MyStream my6sense_Twitter

It is a tricky challenge for me to write an unbiased review of my6sense because I am not a representative user. Hence, I will write about the limitations I experienced when using the app, and also attempt to assess it from the perspective of an average user.

Digital Intuition Engine

There is a period of learning required for the relevance engine to understand your personal preference for content. The app tracks which items you click, how long you spend time reading items, and which items you share, to gauge the relevance of items to you.

Within 2-3 days of using the app, I could start ‘sensing’ the digital intuition engine. The more time you spend using it, the better it gets.

my6sense_Item_Menu my6sense_Settings_Content

I have previously written about different approaches to filtering information for relevance. my6sense uses a combination of filtering based on social graph and algorithms. It assesses whose tweets and Google Reader shares interest you the most from your social graph, and uses semantic analysis of the linked content to determine relevance.

One of the things I liked is that the focus is purely on relevance – so-called influencers are not given a boost and your content is truly personalized.

Why I Am Not A Representative User

Before going further, I need to explain in brief why this app is not part of my daily news reading routine.

  • As technology news editors, we often break stories virtually in real-time before they are covered by tech blogs. my6sense is not meant for discovering breaking news.
  • I have written several times about how I am brutal in curating my sources. I follow a few hundred people on Twitter and between 25-30 on Google Reader/Buzz. my6sense is more suited for those who follow a large number of people.
  • I spend very few hours every morning to catch up with news and spend the rest of the day covering breaking news. my6sense is more suited for those who have more than a 12 hour backlog.

Limitations & Recommendations

  1. My most relevant content on Twitter is in my Techmeme Leaderboard Twitter List. I do not follow any of these Twitter accounts. There is no way I can tell my6sense to focus on a specific Twitter List for relevant content. I suspect a lot of heavy Twitter users use Lists to organize their following and I would rate this support to be a high priority requirement.
  2. There is no two-way sync between Google Reader and my6sense. Items read via Streams in my6sense are not correspondingly Mark As Read in Google Reader. You can share items on Google Buzz but they don’t seem to be shared in Google Reader. As I have a dedicated Google Reader following, this necessitates an unnecessary duplication of effort. It would be great if items shared on Buzz are shared on Google Reader as well.
  3. No desktop or web-based version.
  4. In the Streams view, it would be helpful to have counts of the items similar to unread counts shown in Google Reader. I found myself checking each folder in turn, only to find no items within it.
  5. Imported steams from Google Reader appear to be stale. It continues to show items that I have already previously read and shared, while new items are not always shown. For example, here are two screenshots of a feed folder taken at the same time while writing this post:

GReader_Folder_Brands

my6sense_StreamFolderView_Brands

These are essentially the reasons why my6sense is not a part of my daily news reading routine.

The Incredible Potential

I have already written about how my6sense is part of the Personalized Serendipity Quadrant in my Relevancy Matrix – the hottest space for many startups today. After having tried many services aiming for personalized relevance, I can say without hesitation that my6sense’s Digital Intuition Engine is way ahead. It’s combination of semantic analysis and social graph filtering provides a unique experience that you can intuitively feel working for you.

The mobile apps are said to be just a demo of the powerful API provided by the backend. It is exciting to think of the possibilities in which this engine can be utilized. From personalized content on publishers’ websites to integration with Twitter clients – my6sense has potential to unlock relevance in the ever-increasing information deluge. With Barak Hachamov’s vision and Louis Gray’s marketing, there is incredible promise indeed.

For most average users, who need to catch up with news and shares from social networks, I would heartily recommend my6sense in the Top 5 ‘must-have’ mobile app category.

Tagged with:
 

A few days back, I tweeted:


There is a subtle but crucial difference between targeting a startup towards influencers, and targeting it towards early-adopters.less than a minute ago via TweetDeck

I think that it needed some elaboration, hence this brief post.

It is generally well-accepted that a new service or startup needs significant traction from both influencers and early-adopters to succeed. But it is important to ensure that all users get the same level of experience and perceived benefit from using the service.

What do I mean? How can a service provide unequal perceived benefit? There are some typical ways this can happen:

  • Emphasizing numbers – followers, likes, etc. that make influencers with large followings prominent within the service
  • Content Filtering Driven by Influence – propagating posts with more ‘likes’ or comments to the top of users’ stream
  • Top User Lists – maintaining a dashboard that emphasizes users with large followings

And so on. You get the idea.

I have seen many services do this in order to attract influencer affection, and they’re pretty successful at that. But in the long run, this strategy isn’t sustainable and doesn’t work. Here’s why.

1. Only a handful of influencers can dominate any service. You aren’t leaving room for the rest.

2. Many early-adopters are soon dejected as the service seems to be geared towards those who get the most attention.

3. The exhortations from the influencers who dominate the service begin to fall on deaf ears and get a cynical response.

4. There’s a backlash from those dejected early-adopters and the influencers who were left-out, and this group starts making negative remarks about the service.

5. In some time, there are two splintered camps. A minority group that exhorts the virtues of the great new startup and the majority who doesn’t care about it.

The startup has no chance of being a mainstream success.

Key Lesson: Personalization.

The experience and perceived benefit is equal to all users if the service is personalized and tailored to each user on an equal footing. This is a more sustainable and long-term growth strategy that has greater chances of making it in the long run.

Tagged with:
 

Speaking at the ad:tech conference, Foursquare CEO Dennis Crowley offered a glimpse into the future of the service.

Customized Recommendations: Crowley discussed the possibility of a smarter algorithm that would make customized recommendations based on a user’s checkin history.

Brand Discovery: Building upon the idea of a smarter algorithm that would make recommendations based on where you’ve been, Crowley illustrated a future where brands would also be fused into that experience.

Compare this with Facebook’s announcement of Deals yesterday: Recommendations and Deal discovery will be based on Location Proximity and your Friends’ who enjoy deals.

Where have we seen this algorithmic vs. social approach before? :)

Also compare these quotes:

Dennis:

“We should be able to offer special deals that you may be interested in and we should be able to offer recommendations for the type of things you should do next.”

Schmidt:

“I actually think most people don’t want Google to answer their questions,” he elaborates. “They want Google to tell them what they should be doing next.”

Sound similar?

What does this mean?

Foursquare is taking a Googlesque algorithmic approach to location serendipity, while Facebook is focusing on its social aspect.

I think Foursquare is being cornered against a wall. Foursquare’s social graph is a hybrid one, incorporating friends from Facebook, Twitter, and other sources. With Facebook’s ubiquitous mobile platform unveiled yesterday, it has to one-up Facebook. Hence, it is turning to smarter algorithms, in typical Google fashion.

Will Foursquare face the same fate as other social startups thanks to Facebook? Time will tell.

Tagged with:
 

Is Facebook a Black Hole Sending Social Startups to Oblivion?

Facebook is reportedly testing a new feature to auto-tweet a link to Twitter when you post pictures on Facebook. All Facebook sees this as a danger sign for TwitPic, while TheNextWeb hints that Facebook is aiming for Ping.fm.

This is already becoming a trend. When giant Facebook introduces a new feature, some startups are going to feel the heat. Let’s look at the ground we have covered so far and what may lie in the future.

Startups For Conversation

In Aug 2009, Facebook acquired FriendFeed. We all know what happened since. When Facebook wants to be the place where you go for having conversations, what is the fate of startups focusing on FriendFeed-style conversations? Simler was hyped to some extent last year, and has shut down already. Two hold-outs in the conversation space are Cliqset and Amplify. Here are traffic stats for Cliqset, FriendFeed, and Amplify over the last year:

The graph doesn’t make sense if you include Facebook in it, as both Cliqset and Amplify are indistinguishable from the X-Axis. Both of them have had rave reviews from early-adopters and tech bloggers.

Facebook Groups may well be the nail in the coffin for startups aiming to be the place where you have conversations. Even the giant Google is still struggling with Google Buzz to establish it’s own conversation space independent of Facebook. I don’t see much conversation happening on Windows Live, except as a shell to Facebook.

Startups for Lifestreaming

In my view, the Facebook Newsfeed has effectively demolished the hype surrounding Lifestreaming. StoryTlr shut down in Oct 2009. Chi.mp continues to exist, providing a free way to own your own domain, content, and identity. Have you heard anything about it in the last six months?

The concept of having your own content on your own domain with your own identity appears to have died in the age of the social web, except in the hearts of a few digerati.

Social Commenting

Facebook has now introduced voting in its comments plugin. Once it becomes adequately feature-rich, it will be an attractive option for publishers wanting to capitalize on traffic from Facebook. This can be a direct threat to Disqus, Intense Debate, and Echo, as noted by RWW last month.

Why would Facebook be interested in comments? A comment is a stronger signal than “Like”. Users may “Like” content casually, but when they comment, it indicates true engagement.

None of these commenting startups have been able to capitalize on the social aspect of commenting, where you can follow where your friends have commented. Facebook has the wherewithal to do this and I would expect this to be a focus area for Facebook in the future.

Social Startup Funding

Last month, Kleiner Perkins announced the launch of the $250 million sFund, in partnership with Facebook, Amazon, and Zynga to encourage innovation in social. From the release:

Facebook will contribute access to its platform teams, beta APIs, and new programs, like Facebook Credits.

In other words, integrate and play nice with Facebook if you’re a social startup eyeing any of that money.

Is there room for startups in the social space independent of Facebook? Twitter has not exactly been kind to developers in its ecosystem, while the waiting game with Google continues. The Age of Facebook seems to have begun.

Tagged with:
 

Facebook’s Main Enemy Is Not Google; It Is Email

A recent research survey revealed that:

  • Over 66% of web users share content with friends and family, with 50% doing it at least once a week.
  • 86% of respondents still used email to share content, while only 49% said they used Facebook.
  • For ages 18-24, 76% said they used Facebook to share content, compared with 70% via email

For all the tech press that the Facebook vs. Google battle receives, I think this is a more fundamental battle that is key to Facebook in the long term.

Why?

Email Is Private

Gmail’s famed creator Paul Buchheit has been with Facebook for over a year. We have not seen any noteworthy feature enhancement to Facebook’s internal messaging system for a long time. They have introduced Places, Groups, high-res Photos, and a host of other enhancements, but nothing for messaging.

This is because private messages between people are explicitly private. There is no social element involved that can be legitimately captured. Remember the Gmail targeted ad controversy? Facebook has already learnt that lesson, thanks to Google.

Email Bypasses Facebook

Email works with standard POP3/IMAP protocols and is interoperable between platforms, services, and devices from various vendors. Emails sent between web users of these different services offer no value for Facebook. In fact, Email bypasses Facebook altogether and therein lies the battle.

Facebook wants to know when you Like any content on the web. Facebook wants to be the place where you go to share content you Like. The Facebook Like button is intended to replace the Email Send button.

The Future Is Public Social Sharing

Who will win this battle? Web user behavior is largely turning to public social sharing. Emails are being reduced largely to notifications and quick messages, rather than any real content sharing. It isn’t so difficult to see where we’re headed. Just ask the 18-24 year olds.

Tagged with:
 

What do you do when you make an embarrassing mistake on the social web? I have been seeing different behaviors and wanted to pen my thoughts on how your behavior affects the trust others place in you.

Yesterday, a well-known person in the tech world tweeted a screenshot about what she thought was a new feature in Gmail. After I pointed out that it probably wasn’t a new feature at all, she simply deleted her tweet.

At the same time, a tech blog picked up her tweet and wrote a blog post describing this ‘new’ Gmail feature. After I @replied the blogger, rather than updating the post, they deleted the post entirely. (They later reinstated the post after I publicly voiced my disappointment).

Many months earlier, the same person had retweeted a TechCrunch tweet that had a sensational headline, but a bad URL link. It was obvious that she had retweeted it without even clicking on the link. After realizing what had happened, she simply deleted her retweet.

Contrast this with the following examples.

Yesterday, a prominent Indian celebrity’s Twitter account was hacked, and it started tweeting malicious URLs. Others started retweeting these with comments about it being hacked.

As soon as a friend I follow discovered that these URLs were malicious, she deleted her old-style retweet. But after that, she tweeted publicly that she was doing so to avoid others clicking on that link.

Couple of days back, I wrote a post about Schmidt’s comments apparently disappearing from a WSJ article. It was soon brought to my attention that the comments were indeed there, and another news story was merged with the original one, which had caused the confusion.

Within seconds, I scrambled to update the post, tweet that it was a mistake on my part, and thank the person who pointed it out both in the post and on Twitter. The thought of deleting the post entirely never even crossed my mind.

There are several other instances I have seen on FriendFeed, where a few people made rude comments about someone. In some cases, they apologized in later comments, in others, they simply deleted the rude remarks. In the case of the former, the relationships healed, in the latter, they were permanently estranged.

There are numerous such examples all of us encounter in the social web. The different behaviors I’ve seen fall under three broad categories:

  1. Delete any instances revealing the mistake and say nothing about it publicly.
  2. Delete any instances revealing the mistake, and thank the person who pointed it out privately.
  3. Retain the evidence of your mistake, and publicly thank the person who pointed it out.

Most people I’ve observed practice either #1 or #2. They hope that in this world of inter-connected networks, their cross-posted tweets and comments that are auto-posted and shared across a multitude of other networks won’t be seen by the majority of their followers. These practices avoid the public embarrassment, while apparently retaining their trust and influence with those who didn’t discover the mistake.

On the other hand, virtually all the people whom I trust and respect the most in the online world, follow #3. Why?

Because not only do they retain their trust and influence, they actually enhance it by their public admission and expression of gratitude. They know and accept that to err is human. Their public admission shows all their followers that their word can be trusted. Their public expression of gratitude reveals that they listen to their followers and are ready to admit their mistakes.

They convert an embarrassing “Oops!” moment into an opportunity to build their trust. What do you think? Which of the three categories of behavior do you think is the best?

Tagged with:
 

From the Google Zeitgeist conference Tuesday, the WSJ reports:

Mr. Schmidt said Google hoped to at least get access to Facebook users’ contact lists so that people can grow their social network on Google. He said, without elaborating, that Google’s products would incorporate more social-networking elements later this year.

"The best thing that would happen is for Facebook to open up its data," Mr. Schmidt said. "Failing that, there are other ways to get that information." He declined to be specific.

In other words, Google is now admitting that it wants access to Facebook’s social graph.

A Mess Of Multiple Social Graphs

Consider the implications of this admission. At present, Google has built multiple social graphs:

Now, despite having built all these social graphs over the years, Google wants access to your Facebook Friends, which is an implicit admission of its past social failures.

Microsoft’s Approach To Social: “The Glue”

In a recent blog post, Microsoft described their approach of partnering for social:

Facebook, MySpace, Orkut and QQ have become more general-purpose social networks for all of your acquaintances. LinkedIn, Xing, and Viadeo are great places for professional interactions, …there are great photo and video sharing sites like Flickr and YouTube, and hundreds of others that provide content and let customers post, comment, rate and re-share.

In light of this, we’re not trying to be yet another general-purpose social network, real-time public broadcast channel, or video sharing site. There are great services out there for these things already.

Microsoft’s approach seems to be working. With 330 million active users, Windows Live Messenger is the #4 worldwide app used by active Facebook users, just behind the most popular games like Farmville.

Windows Live is thus connected to 40+ different services, including virtually all of the popular social networks, audio/video/photo/music networks, and anything else you can imagine. They are also partnering with anyone using open standards like OAuth, Portable Contacts, Activity Streams, etc. – no longer a Google USP.

This stealth approach by Microsoft was also identified as Google’s approach by the Altimeter Group last year, but Google has not made much progress since then.

Where Does Google Me Go From Here?

From the latest reports, Google Me is about an additional “social layer” on top of:

  • YouTube – I see this as a primary thrust area for Google (social recommendations)
  • Search – possible enhancements to Social Search
  • Google Maps – greater integration with Latitude, possibly FourSquare?
  • Picasa /Flickr – social sharing enhancements
  • A social gaming platform – from Zynga

The key question is, which social graph will Google use to add this “social layer”? With rivals Facebook and Microsoft partnering closely, Google has one ally left: Twitter. An integration of Google Profiles with Twitter can yield exciting possibilities.

Twitter’s relationship with Windows Live isn’t going too good. This might be Google’s opportunity in disguise. However, it’s going to be an uphill battle.

Update: After writing this post, All Things D reports a deepening of ties between Facebook and Microsoft Bing. This is a direct assault on Google’s bread-n-butter search business. All the more reason why Google needs to reciprocate by deepening its ties with Twitter.

Twitter is increasingly becoming a media company and a pervasive news platform, as Mathew Ingram writes at GigaOm. Why not a Twitter-integrated Google News? A personalized Google News based on users’ social graph on Twitter would be a great start.

Tagged with:
 

Mapping Startups & Services Filtering For Relevance In A Matrix

After looking at the different approaches to filtering for Relevance, I have been seeking a way to map them visually. There are many different startups competing in this space along with the giants, and a way to map them in a matrix would help us see the big picture of how the battle for relevance is evolving on the social web.

What are the fundamental ways in which these approaches and startups differ? These could form the axis around which we can then proceed to map them.

The Popular – Personalized Axis

Filtering either works by showing us the most popular stuff being shared online, or by understanding our individual preferences and surfacing personalized content. Thus, we have the following axis:

PopularPersonalized

The Serendipity – Search Axis

You either search for content or you see it serendipitously without seeking anything specific. Search is actively initiated by the user and is goal-driven, while serendipitous discovery is gifted with the user being passive at the receiving end. This gives us our second axis:

SerendipitySearch

The Filtering for Relevance Matrix (FORMAT)

We combine these two axes to form the backbone of our visualization. We then place different services within our matrix as per their core filtering approach. The result is the Filtering FOR Relevance Matrix (FORMAT) as seen below:

 

Format

Let us now look at each quadrant closely.

Popular – Search Quadrant

This is the simplest and oldest of all. Search powered by algorithms to surface most popular content online. This also includes other Twitter search services like Topsy. These services are powered by algorithms such as PageRank, PersonRank, Resonance, etc. to surface the most popular result relevant to a query.

This approach dominated the Web 1.0 era before the advent of the social web.

Popular – Serendipity Quadrant

Services in this category help you find the most popular content being shared online across different social networks. These were the next to evolve in the Web 2.0 era, beginning with social bookmarking services like Reddit, StumbleUpon, etc.

There is an element of personalization provided by many of these, in that you “follow” some users, but the motive behind such following is less to seek personalized content, more to seek trending, viral content.

Note how Digg is attempting to move from this quadrant to the personalized quadrant, and facing hurdles along the way.

Search – Personalized Quadrant

A breed of services has evolved around delivering personalized recommendations and content tailored for your needs. Hunch learns about you and acts as a “taste engine”, while Blekko allows you to personalize your searches with slashtags. Google is making forays in this space with its Social Search service, which tries to personalize search results based on your social graph.

Personalized Serendipity Quadrant

This is the hottest space where most of the competition is today.

Twitter Lists are personalized (created by you) and deliver fresh, serendipitous content relevant to your interests. Facebook Likes give you serendipitous discovery from your personal friends. Flipboard provides a social magazine based on your personal social circle on Facebook and Twitter. My6sense delivers new content using ‘Digital Intuition’. Vertical networks like Last.fm deliver music recommendations based on your individual taste. Personalized Twitter newspapers give you fresh content filtered by your social graph on Twitter.

Note how Datasift lies at the center of the matrix. This is because Datasift is a platform providing different filtering services and approaches. Developers may use the platform to develop different services and apps that can lie in any of these quadrants.

How does FORMAT help?

So what is the point of this exercise? Using FORMAT:

  • We see the big picture of how services providing relevance and filtering are evolving.
  • We see how personalized serendipity is the holy grail of the social web right now.
  • We see how different services relate to each other and who is competing with whom and how.
  • We see how identifying the target quadrant is important for any new startup in this space.
  • We see how users provide friction when a service tries to change quadrants (Digg).

If you are involved in a startup aiming to provide filtered, relevant content to users, which quadrant would you target? See how FORMAT helps?

Tagged with:
 

DataSift Curation Engine Aims for Relevance in Real-time

As I have said many times previously, if 2009 was all about the hype of Real-time, the future is all about capturing Relevance in real-time. Datasift has partnered with Twitter to get the full Twitter firehose and is building a platform to enable curation and filtering in real-time.Datasift

An introductory video about Datasift was posted in their first blog post, which didn’t reveal much about how the platform works. Now, uber-geek Robert Scoble has posted a video of an extensive discussion with Datasift’s founder, Nick Halstead.

Robert Scoble with Datasift founder Nick Halstead

This post is a summary of Datasift as discussed above concluding with my own thoughts.

The Basics

Twitter’s firehose at present has around 800 tweets/sec, or 70 million tweets/day. Datasift can filter this firehose using over 20 variables. Examples of these variables include:

  • Profile information like name, location, bio, number of follows, followers, lists, etc.
  • Text and language of tweets
  • Geo-location of tweets
  • Verified users
  • Source of tweets – web, Seesmic, TweetDeck, etc.
  • Number of Retweets
  • Whether tweet contains a hyperlink

Datasift is a rules-based engine that can filter this firehose using thousands of complex rules and provide a filtered stream in real-time within milliseconds. It is built using a Service Oriented Architecture and has an API.

The Rules

Rules can comprise of any combination of filters using the above variables. Rules can be combined and merged, or added and subtracted, into a single new rule. Stream outputs from Datasift using such rules can become columns in Twitter clients like TweetDeck.

Here are a few examples of how rules can be used:

  • Show me tweets containing “google” from users who don’t have “social media” in their bio, and who have more than 500 followers.
  • Show me tweets from my curated Twitter list of tech brands that have more than 100 Retweets.
  • Show me tweets originating from within a radius of 5 miles from the location of XYZ Conference that don’t have swear words, irrespective of whether their tweets contain the hashtag for the conference.
  • Show me tweets originating from Starbucks shops around the world, of users who are “Verified Accounts”, irrespective of what they’re about.

Datasift’s website is intended as a community website for curators and developers to collaboratively work on developing these rules. You can leverage rules created by others to avoid duplication of effort. Rules are classified with tags, and Datasift provides search, ranking and trending for easier discoverability of rules.

Partnerships for Influence Tracking and Sentiment Analysis

Datasift has partnered with PeerIndex and Klout to enable filtering using their influence and authority scores. It has also partnered with a firm for real-time sentiment analysis.

Thus, any of the above rules can be filtered further using such scores, and a stream of tweets with negative sentiment about a brand or product, combined with any other rules, can be monitored in real-time.

Alerts and Analytics

For esoteric rules that may provide a result infrequently, alerts can be set up. The example discussed is of any politicians from a Twitter list tweeting the word “scandal”. Developers can send these alerts as email, SMS, or notifications on smartphones.

The resulting streams from all rules applied by the engine are stored by Datasift. This data can be extracted, segmented, and analyzed later. For example, this can be used to track the performance of social media campaigns.

Relevance Filtering of Links

Datasift can use TweetMeme and other databases to check the links in tweets, and determine whether they are relevant to a specific topic. Not much details on how this is achieved, but apparently, Nick says that all sites are already classified into different subjects by Tweetmeme and other such databases.

Blekko-style Twitter Search

Datasift has developed a prototype of Twitter search along the lines of Blekko’s slashtags. Thus, along with your query text, you can use filters such as “/nolinks” to get tweets without links, or “/California” to get tweets originating from CA.

RSS Feeds

Compared to the massive volume of the Twitter firehose, the volume of RSS is minimal. Datasift plans to have their own PubSubHubbub server. Developers and third-parties can plugin any RSS feeds and use Datasift’s filtering rules to get an output feed.

Revenue Model

One option is free access to the stream with in-stream ads. Ads will be tailored and designed for the target form factor – desktop/mobile/tablet/etc.

Second option is selling data B2B for developers and brand companies, charged by volume of data consumed.

Prospective Partners

Datasift is seeking to work with startups like Flipboard, who are creating new ways for curated content consumption. This can also include any of the startups focusing on Relevance, such as TwitterTimes or Paperli.

My Thoughts

When I compared approaches to filtering information for relevance, I had suggested that the service most likely to succeed would be the one that supports multiple approaches and platforms. We can easily see that Datasift supports all platforms and several approaches like crowdsourced filtering, influence filtering, location filtering, etc. It is easily the most powerful relevance filtering engine I have seen yet.

The market of end-users for curated real-time content is at present unknown. Startups involved in creating pleasant experiences for consuming content have yet to find a monetization strategy. The degree of Datasift’s success from an end-user perspective is largely dependent on:

  • The creativity of developers and curators to create compelling experiences, and
  • How the monetization strategies of presentation apps fare and how Datasift is able to work with them

Nevertheless, with the amount of content being created online growing exponentially, curation and filtering will eventually become necessities for any social media client. It is just a matter of time.

I also see a bright future on the B2B front. By partnering with influence and authority tracking companies, combined with sentiment analysis, Datasift may already be a compelling choice for brand monitoring and social media reputation tracking.

Lastly, thanks to Robert Scoble and Nick Halstead for the interesting interview.

Tagged with:
 

Switch to our mobile site