EveryDNS.net, which provided DNS services to the wikileaks.org domain has terminated them at 10 PM EST, December 2, 2010, citing threats to the stability of their infrastructure.EveryDNS.net - DNS for the rest of us.

Update: Wikileaks has tweeted that it has moved to Switzerland:


WikiLeaks moves to Switzerland http://wikileaks.ch/less than a minute ago via web

Indeed, you can now access it at http://wikileaks.ch which points to http://213.251.145.96/

A Who.is lookup for wikileaks.ch reveals that though the domain may be registered in Switzerland, the server is located in Stockholm, Sweden:

Who.is Wikileaks.ch

In a statement posted on their website, EveryDNS.net stated:

EveryDNS.net provided domain name system (DNS) services to the wikileaks.org domain name until 10PM EST, December 2, 2010, when such services were terminated. As with other users of the EveryDNS.net network, this service was provided for free. The termination of services was effected pursuant to, and in accordance with, the EveryDNS.net Acceptable Use Policy.

More specifically, the services were terminated for violation of the provision which states that "Member shall not interfere with another Member’s use and enjoyment of the Service or another entity’s use and enjoyment of similar services." The interference at issues arises from the fact that wikileaks.org has become the target of multiple distributed denial of service (DDOS) attacks. These attacks have, and future attacks would, threaten the stability of the EveryDNS.net infrastructure, which enables access to almost 500,000 other websites.

Thus, last night, at approximately 10PM EST, December 1, 2010 a 24 hour termination notification email was sent to the email address associated with the wikileaks.org account. In addition to this email, notices were sent to Wikileaks via Twitter and the chat function available through the wikileaks.org website. Any downtime of the wikileaks.org website has resulted from its failure to use another hosted DNS service provider.

Update: EveryDNS has further clarified their position, with another statement at 11 AM EST:

First, let’s be clear, this is a difficult issue to deal with and there are opinions on all sides. Second, EveryDNS.net, the world’s largest free managed DNS provider, is not taking a position on the content hosted on the wikileaks.org or wikileaks.ch website, it is following established policies so as not to put any one EveryDNS.net user’s interests ahead of any others. Lastly, regardless of what people say about the actions of EveryDNS.net, we know this much is true – we believe in our New Hampshire state motto, Live Free or Die.

With that said:

EveryDNS.net is a free community-based service.

EveryDNS.net does not host content. The Domain Name System (DNS) service routes Internet traffic from domain names to IP addresses.

EveryDNS.net, a provider of free managed DNS services, supports nearly 500,000 websites worldwide.

At 10PM EST, on Wednesday December 1, 2010 a 24-hour termination notification email was sent to the email address associated with the wikileaks.org account. In addition to this email, notices were sent to Wikileaks via Twitter and the chat function available through the wikileaks.org website.

Any downtime of the wikileaks.org website has resulted from its failure to, with plentiful advance notice, use another DNS solution.

Yesterday, pursuant to the EveryDNS.net Acceptable Use Policy the primary DNS hosted domains were disabled. Today, also in accordance with the EveryDNS.net Acceptable Use Policy, the secondary DNS hosted domains, including wikileaks.ch, were disabled.

EveryDNS.net is not taking a position on the content hosted on the wikileaks.org or wikileaks.ch website, it is following established policies. No one EveryDNS.net user has the right to put at risk, yesterday, today or tomorrow, the service that hundreds of thousands of other websites depend on.

Their Twitter account also posted the following tweet:


24 hours ago we made a decision we believe is in the best interest of our users and customers. Please read: http://everydns.netless than a minute ago via web

Earlier, Wikileaks confirmed on Twitter:


WikiLeaks,org domain killed by US everydns.net after claimed mass attacks KEEP US STRONG https://donations.datacell.com/less than a minute ago via web

The troubles continue for Wikileaks, which was booted from Amazon Web Services. Senator Lieberman has also introduced a legislation that would make it a federal crime for anyone to publish the name of a U.S. intelligence source.

For non-technical folks, DNS (Domain Name System) is the protocol used to translate friendly names on the Internet (wikileaks.org) to their numeric IP addresses. This means that Wikileaks still continues to own the domain “wikileaks.org”, but it’s not accessible through that name on the Internet.

Here is a comprehensive list of Wikileaks mirrors: http://wikileaks.info/ Thanks, Lidija Davis!

Tagged with:
 

Update: It seems the WSJ has combined and merged two different stories. The quote from Schmidt is still there, though way below in the new merged copy. Thanks, Henry Blodget!

Yesterday, I wrote about Schmidt’s comments reported by the WSJ on wanting users’ Facebook contact lists. The post from WSJ appeared on Techmeme:

Techmeme Snapshot of WSJ

The quote from Schmidt in question, led to headlines like these, from Fortune:

Techmeme Snapshot of Fortune

Except, if you visit that WSJ story, it has been replaced with an entirely different one:

New WSJ Story

What’s up?

I tried searching for the old story on WSJ.com, but it’s not available anymore. I tried the cached version of that page from all search engines but couldn’t get the old story.

Strangely, Reuters reporting on the same event did not have the same quote from Schmidt that the WSJ had:

“The best thing that would happen is for Facebook to open up its data,” Mr. Schmidt said. “Failing that, there are other ways to get that information.” He declined to be specific.

At present, both the WSJ and Mr. Schmidt can deny these reports.

The only place I can find this story, with that quote, is on Voices on All Things Digital, which gets a syndicated feed from the WSJ. And in case that too disappears, here’s a snapshot for proof:

Schmidt Quote from WSJ

It is certainly strange that the Wall Street Journal should replace an old story with a new one with the exact same URL. Is there something going on that we are not supposed to know about?

Tagged with:
 

Can Blekko be a Disruptor in Search?

Blekko is a new search engine currently in private beta, and I have been playing with it for the past few days. Co-founder Rich Skrenta says upfront that Blekko is not a Google-killer, and I agree. However, for a few search enthusiasts to begin with, it is a very interesting Google alternative to come up in many years.

Blekko Search

If you are unfamiliar with Blekko, read this introductory article by Mike Arrington. For a detailed look, read this in-depth review by Danny Sullivan.

A SlashTag For Techmeme Leaderboard

I wanted to have a handy way to search all the websites that make up the Techmeme Leaderboard. It turned out to be simpler than I thought. A straight import of the OPML file helped create my “/TMTop” slashtag that I could use to get quality search results for anything related to technology.

For generic search terms like “credit card”, the difference between search results from Google and Blekko is obvious:

Google Credit Card

Blekko Credit Card for TMTop

Higher Relevance With Curated Search

When comparing approaches to filtering for relevance, I noted how Google search is built almost entirely on algorithms, with minimal human intervention directly on search results. Being a monopoly in the search business, Google has gone to great lengths to ensure that its search algorithm is fair and impartial with no human bias.

Blekko turns this principle upside-down, by giving end users the ability to curate their search. This mix of human + algorithmic filtering leads to potentially very high relevance of search results. Why potentially?

Keyword vs. Slashtag

Consider an example. Let’s say I’m searching to troubleshoot problems with iTunes on a Windows PC. The key question is: can Blekko’s “iTunes problems /windows” perform better than Google’s “iTunes problems windows”? The answer, at present, is no. Google’s first result is Apple’s official support site for iTunes on Windows, while Blekko doesn’t include www.apple.com as part of its “/windows” slashtag.

In fact, at present, even a plain search for “iTunes problems windows” without any slashtag on Blekko doesn’t return the Apple support site in the first few results.

These are difficult challenges for Blekko. Slashtags may not be as effective as you might think. This is because curation is an either-or affair – there is no ‘maybe’ as there can be deep inside an algorithm.

Combining Social Features with Search

Blekko has added social features by enabling you to “follow” other users’ slashtags. This means those who can aggregate a carefully curated set of websites within a slashtag stand a chance of being followed by several other users. This sounds appealing as anything social does these days.

But a reality check: who makes “following” popular on the web? Celebrities and Websites/Blogs whose primary objective is driving traffic to their own content. A slashtag may be a curator’s achievement, but it drives traffic to various sites by definition. Thus, I don’t see any popular brands, celebrities, or content creators to drive the social features of Blekko, hence I suspect it will remain restricted to the minority of search enthusiasts.

Impact on SEO: Slashtag Optimization (STO)?

Will Blekko’s human curation mean that algorithm-focused SEO will suffer? That largely depends on market share of Blekko’s adoption. Greg Sterling has a nice post discussing this issue.

Imagine being able to set default slashtags in your search preferences that filter content farms, adult websites, etc. Search will get a boost in effectiveness of several orders of magnitude. This, coupled with the transparency Blekko brings to the table about its internal SEO metrics, is one of the best things to happen in search, in my opinion.

Even if a minority of search enthusiasts adopt Blekko, I see two possibilities:

  • Google may tweak its algorithm to penalize content farms, as is being suspected
  • Google may offer tools to filter the web in its own searches

In my opinion, if either of these happen, Blekko has proved to be disruptive.

Tagged with:
 

Top 10 Signs You’re An Early Adopter

Here are the Top 10 Signs you’re an early adopter:

10. You know the exact difference in features between Tumblr and Posterous and why you prefer one over the other.

9. You stalk the social web looking for alpha and beta invites.

8. You’ve lost track of how many accounts you have on hundreds of different websites.

7. You loved FriendFeed and still think that if it had held out, it would’ve become popular.

6. You accept Android fragmentation as a fact of life and don’t see what the issue is all about.

5. You have a Google Profile tailored to your needs and preferences.

4. You use your account on GetSatisfaction to report bugs and provide feedback.

3. You love Gmail and can’t figure out why anyone would want to use anything else.

2. You have RSS for breakfast.

And the #1 sign you’re an early adopter is:

1. You are still searching for the “perfect” Twitter client!

Tagged with:
 

What Does Google Suggest About iPad?

It’s too early, but here’s a sign of what’s coming:

Google on iPad

Tagged with:
 

Switch to our mobile site